Skip to main content
Amusement ParkRanker

Press & media kit

Amusement Park Ranker

Independent park rankings. Clear sources. Editorial judgment, explained.

Press inquiries

Logo downloads

Transparent mark · SVG and 1024 × 1024 PNG

Amusement Park Ranker dark mark

Dark mark

For light backgrounds

SVG Dark markPNG Dark mark
Amusement Park Ranker light mark

Light mark

For dark backgrounds

SVG Light markPNG Light mark

The SVG versions are vector traces of our existing mark. The PNG versions retain the original silhouette and transparent background.

Brand colors

The editorial palette, with its light and dark appearance variants.

  • Editorial accent

    #9D3D13

  • Editorial ink

    #14161A

  • Paper

    #FCFCFC

  • Dark-mode accent

    #E08D66

  • Dark-mode surface

    #1B1814

  • Dark-mode text

    #F3EFE7

About the site

One sentence

Amusement Park Ranker is an independent editorial index comparing 50 amusement parks on thrills, family appeal, value and crowd management.

One paragraph

Amusement Park Ranker is an independent editorial index comparing 50 amusement parks on thrills, family appeal, value and crowd management. Its published methodology combines editorial ratings for thrill and family appeal with externally sourced price, attendance and wait-time data. Park guides, ride comparisons and travel articles help readers weigh the trade-offs behind an overall rank. The index is curated rather than a census of every park, and parks cannot pay for ranking positions.

Key facts

50 parks ranked
The current active editorial index—not a ranking of every park worldwide.
Four scoring factors
Thrill factor 33%; family friendliness 33%; value for money 19%; crowd & wait management 15%. Editorial ratings carry 66% of the total weight.
Published methodology
Factors are standardized across the index before weighting, with a disclosed specialization allowance. Missing data is treated conservatively.
No pay-to-place
Parks, operators and partners cannot buy or request a ranking change. Source-backed factual corrections are welcome.

Data sources

  • Official park and operator websites for ride inventories, ticket and parking prices, and visitor information.
  • Published attendance reports, including TEA/AECOM, with source coverage and limitations noted on park pages.
  • Queue-Times.com for historical posted waits: the 2025-season all-ride annual means, not live queue predictions.
  • Roller Coaster Database (RCDB) and Guinness World Records for sourced ride specifications and records.
  • Public reviews, including Google, Tripadvisor and Theme Park Insider, shown as review context—not a substitute for the disclosed scoring factors.

We compile published information rather than independently auditing park operations. Check official sources before booking.

Using the brand and rankings

Logo use

Use the downloadable mark when identifying or linking to Amusement Park Ranker. Keep its proportions and transparent background; leave clear space around it. Choose the version with clear contrast. Don't stretch, crop, recolor or add effects, or imply our endorsement of a park, product or partner. Park photographs and third-party logos have separate rights; this kit does not license them.

Citing a ranking

Name Amusement Park Ranker, link to the specific ranking or park page, and state when you accessed it. Specify the list and its scope: an overall park rank is not a food, ride or visitor-satisfaction rank. Scores and positions can change; use the live rank badges rather than editing a badge yourself. You may quote short excerpts with attribution, but not republish the full dataset.

Example: “[Park] ranked No. [position] in Amusement Park Ranker’s curated overall park index (accessed [date]),” linked to its park page.

Read the methodologyGet rank badges

Press contact

For interviews, ranking questions or permission requests, email us with your publication, topic and deadline.

cypinlior@gmail.com